New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipsec: Remove dead code for IPsec node encryption #28898
Merged
pchaigno
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
pchaigno:remove-ipsec-node-encryption-code
Nov 6, 2023
Merged
ipsec: Remove dead code for IPsec node encryption #28898
pchaigno
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
pchaigno:remove-ipsec-node-encryption-code
Nov 6, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pchaigno
added
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Oct 31, 2023
pchaigno
force-pushed
the
remove-ipsec-node-encryption-code
branch
from
October 31, 2023 11:19
482fda0
to
1647c49
Compare
Node encryption for IPsec hasn't been supported since 1d2674d ("docs: ipsec: remove node-to-node encryption") and subsequent commits. The feature also wasn't working since several releases. This commit simply removes the code for that feature. This code has no use now and makes changes to IPsec slightly more difficult. Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
pchaigno
force-pushed
the
remove-ipsec-node-encryption-code
branch
from
October 31, 2023 20:19
1647c49
to
66261a7
Compare
/test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we delete EncryptNode
field definition at the same time?
Do you mean the flag? It's still used for WireGuard node encryption. |
jschwinger233
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Nov 2, 2023
pchaigno
removed
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Nov 2, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Nov 2, 2023
pchaigno
added
dont-merge/bad-bot
To prevent MLH from marking ready-to-merge.
and removed
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
dont-merge/bad-bot
To prevent MLH from marking ready-to-merge.
labels
Nov 2, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Nov 4, 2023
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Nov 7, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.14
in 1.14.4
Nov 7, 2023
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
labels
Nov 7, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.13
in 1.13.9
Nov 7, 2023
github-actions
bot
added
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Nov 8, 2023
github-actions
bot
added
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Nov 8, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Node encryption for IPsec hasn't been supported since 1d2674d ("docs: ipsec: remove node-to-node encryption") and subsequent commits. The feature also wasn't working since several releases.
This commit simply removes the code for that feature. This code has no use now and makes changes to IPsec slightly more difficult.
Commit 1d2674d was merged in v1.12 so I marked this code removal for backports to v1.13 and v1.14 to simplify backports there as well.