New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
loader: fix issue where errors cancelled compile cause error logs. #30988
Merged
julianwiedmann
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
tommyp1ckles:pr/tp/improve-loader-compile-cancel-logging
Mar 4, 2024
Merged
loader: fix issue where errors cancelled compile cause error logs. #30988
julianwiedmann
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
tommyp1ckles:pr/tp/improve-loader-compile-cancel-logging
Mar 4, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
Feb 26, 2024
/test |
tommyp1ckles
force-pushed
the
pr/tp/improve-loader-compile-cancel-logging
branch
from
February 26, 2024 22:39
dcaf406
to
1f99f9e
Compare
/test |
tommyp1ckles
force-pushed
the
pr/tp/improve-loader-compile-cancel-logging
branch
from
February 26, 2024 23:29
1f99f9e
to
c81a954
Compare
On Linux/Unix based implementations, exec/cmd.Run will return either context.ContextCancelled or the error "signal: killed" depending on whether the cancellation occurred while the process was running. There's several places we check on ```is.Errors(err, context.Cancelled)``` on whether to emit high level logs about failed program compilations. Because already running cmd.Run() doesn't return an error that satisfies this, this will result in spurious error logs about failed compilation (i.e. "signal: killed") This meant that in cases where a compilation is legitimately cancelled, we would still log an error such as msg="BPF template object creation failed" ... error="...: compile bpf_lxc.o: signal: killed" This can occur occasionally in CI, which enforces no error to pass, causing failures. example: ``` ctx, c := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Second) go func() { time.Sleep(time.Second) c() }() cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, "sleep", "2") fmt.Println(cmd.Run()) ctx, c = context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Second) c() cmd = exec.CommandContext(ctx, "sleep", "2") fmt.Println(cmd.Run()) ``` To fix this, this will join in the ctx.Err() if it is: * context.Cancelled * The process has not exited itself. * The process appeared to be SIGKILL'ed. Addresses: cilium#30991 Signed-off-by: Tom Hadlaw <tom.hadlaw@isovalent.com>
tommyp1ckles
force-pushed
the
pr/tp/improve-loader-compile-cancel-logging
branch
from
February 26, 2024 23:30
c81a954
to
1e0f141
Compare
/test |
/test |
tommyp1ckles
added
sig/loader
Impacts the loading of BPF programs into the kernel.
area/CI
Continuous Integration testing issue or flake
release-note/ci
This PR makes changes to the CI.
labels
Feb 27, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
removed
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
labels
Feb 27, 2024
dylandreimerink
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2024
👋 if this occurs in CI, should we also backport to older releases for reducing flakes? |
@julianwiedmann I didn't notice it happening in other branches, I think the uptick in these failing CI was also related to other changes in 0.16.0. However, this does seem like a minor bug either way so I think we can justify backporting this. |
tommyp1ckles
added
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
labels
Mar 8, 2024
jibi
added
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
and removed
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Mar 13, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.13
to Needs backport from main
in 1.13.13
Mar 13, 2024
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Mar 13, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.14
in 1.14.8
Mar 13, 2024
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
labels
Mar 13, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
backport-pending/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is in progress.
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Mar 16, 2024
jrajahalme
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport done to v1.15
in 1.15.3
Mar 26, 2024
jrajahalme
moved this from Backport pending to v1.14
to Backport done to v1.14
in 1.14.9
Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/CI
Continuous Integration testing issue or flake
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is done.
release-note/ci
This PR makes changes to the CI.
sig/loader
Impacts the loading of BPF programs into the kernel.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On Linux/Unix based implementations, exec/cmd.Run will return either context.ContextCancelled or the error "signal: killed" depending on whether the cancellation occured while the process was running.
There's several places we check on
is.Errors(err, context.Cancelled)
on whether to emit high level logs about failed program compilations. Because already running cmd.Run() doesn't return an error that satisfies this, this will result in spurious error logs about failed compilation (i.e. "signal: killed")This meant that in cases where a compilation is legitimately cancelled, we would still log an error such as
msg="BPF template object creation failed" ... error="...: compile bpf_lxc.o: signal: killed"
This can occur occasionally in CI, which enforces no error to pass, causing failures.
example:
To fix this, this will join in the ctx.Err() if it is:
Addresses: #30991