You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This repo contains code derived from Nomad contracts without proper attribution and license information. As an author of the code involved, I'm happy that you found the work useful. Reuse of our code is praise
However, to use our work in compliance with the license, please add the appropriate MIT or Apache-2.0 license text (at your option) information to the files containing reproduced or derived code as well as a note in the README that some work is reproduced under the appropriate license
I have not done a full compliance audit of the code base, and do not have a full list of files in need of license notices. However, here is a simple example:
This code region is a slightly modified version of this code region, but the file contains no indication that the work is used under either available FLOSS license.
TODOs
Add license notice to files containing derivative or reproduced code
Add note to README describing source and authorship of reproduced code
Notify etherscan verification team of incomplete license information in hosted source files
Optional: cite our work in public comms and/or documentation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for raising this issue. We do import your library, memview-sol - we appreciate your work on that, and many other contributions to the space! Regarding other files in https://github.com/circlefin/evm-cctp-contracts, we have updated the license notice, and README, with attribution: #28.
We are also reaching out to Etherscan to hopefully get that license added.
This repo contains code derived from Nomad contracts without proper attribution and license information. As an author of the code involved, I'm happy that you found the work useful. Reuse of our code is praise
However, to use our work in compliance with the license, please add the appropriate MIT or Apache-2.0 license text (at your option) information to the files containing reproduced or derived code as well as a note in the README that some work is reproduced under the appropriate license
I have not done a full compliance audit of the code base, and do not have a full list of files in need of license notices. However, here is a simple example:
TODOs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: