Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss future of dataset support with stakeholders #4

Open
sdruskat opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Discuss future of dataset support with stakeholders #4

sdruskat opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@sdruskat
Copy link
Member

Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran has got in touch with me to discuss the experimental dataset support and its relation with other (standard) formats and initiatives (W3C DCAT vocabulary, DataCite, RO-crate).

We should initiate this discussion and perhaps bring Arfon into it as well.

@sdruskat sdruskat transferred this issue from another repository Nov 21, 2023
@jspaaks
Copy link
Member

jspaaks commented Nov 27, 2023

Do we have / can we get an overview of which proportion of CITATION.cff files use type: dataset?

@sdruskat
Copy link
Member Author

Do we have / can we get an overview of which proportion of CITATION.cff files use type: dataset?

Yes, I can run an analysis over the corpus I'm harvesting. Will take a bit of time.

@sdruskat
Copy link
Member Author

Didn't take that long:

In the data for 15977 different repositories, I found

  • 327 instances where the CITATION.cff file included a line that starts with the string type: and has the string dataset in the same line for any version of the file I have on record.
  • 321 instances where the CITATION.cff file included a line that starts with the string type: dataset for any version of the file I have on record.

Other files have no type information, or type information different than dataset, or are not UTF-8 decodable.

So given this simple metric, the ratio of repositories with a dataset-type CFF file at any given time is around .02.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants