Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing accuracy gap #45

Closed
wyf0912 opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Testing accuracy gap #45

wyf0912 opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@wyf0912
Copy link

wyf0912 commented Apr 10, 2024

Thanks for your great work!

Did you meet the problem that the testing accuracy is much lower than the training one?
My reproduced test PSNR is only 19.75 (25.34 in the paper) while the training PSNR is the same as the paper.

I repeated the experiment many times but the problem always exists.

Looking for your reply.

132501712754502_ pic

@inspirelt
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, please follow

# In the Bungeenerf dataset, we propose to set the following three parameters to True,
to set the dist-related parameters. We will update the inconvenient configuration system as soon as possible.

@wyf0912
Copy link
Author

wyf0912 commented Apr 21, 2024

Thanks for your reply. I solved the problem by updating the CUDA.

@wyf0912 wyf0912 closed this as completed Apr 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants