-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specs to be merged with CS_Hardware #7
Comments
Does this
mean changing the repo's name to I've thought of this, but Hardware (which currently is (one kind of) table) deserves to focus on hardware. Like setting up the camera the right way, recommended LED panels for efficient lighting, different alternatives for the table (dominant wood version), methods in projector mounting(how many degrees of freedom is preferable),,, so forth. Where deploy is another layer more like an integration of hardware and software. (I think CSL is kind of this, although we are seeing less adoption of this concept.)
We can raise the hierarchy of the CS_Hardware repo, having a trade off for visiting two repo's to get along. what do you think? |
The other way around: We can make CS_Hardware a one-stop-shop for deployment/setup/spec details. [eg CS_DEPLOY / CS_BUILD or any other exciting name..] I don't think we should have I also agree that CSL concept is kinda lost, but might evolve when more 'unofficial' collabs will join. CSL is more site/context specific, so I'd keep a generic CS_DEPLOY repo for the most generic form of deployment, and CSL's for specific cases. |
my 20 Cents, I think it's not that bad in the wiki of cityscope.github.io which is the kind of global entry point no? |
@agrignard if so I'd merge CS_HARDWARE into here. |
Well a repo with no code is basically a wiki no? The repo would be needed for what? cad files for instances? |
@agrignard take a look into |
Yes that s what I saw, there is some pdf and some Cad... not really code but why not. |
we can always have an SDK page on the ML site ;) |
@yasushisakai @agrignard If there are no objections I'm merging |
If it is going to be binary, |
@yasushisakai Can this hold |
yes, just like a normal repository, it will hold anything.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 5:15 PM Ariel Noyman ***@***.***> wrote:
@yasushisakai <https://github.com/yasushisakai> Can this hold dxf or pdf?
Also, how easy it is to point someone to this as a starting point?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABbr5JnWlhf_tF7Qd6bW6JvqAKRbbPmLks5to7iJgaJpZM4TUzqC>
.
--
Yasushi Sakai
yasushis@mit.edu
+1-702-831-2195
|
Done -- see new readme + hardware |
I just fix a broken link in the wiki as the repo doesn't exist anymore. Maybe the wiki need some refactoring according to this new modification? |
closing |
Thanks for adding this -- https://github.com/CityScope/cityscope.github.io/wiki/Specification-for-CityScope-system
should be merged and renamed into https://github.com/CityScope/CS_Hardware to avoid duplication.
CS_DEPLOY for naming?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: