Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put AC on CDN #180

Open
mlewand opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Put AC on CDN #180

mlewand opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mlewand
Copy link
Contributor

mlewand commented Mar 17, 2016

With GPL release we'll also put AC on our CDN, with following URL:

//cdn.ckeditor.com/a11ychecker/<version>/

e.g. //cdn.ckeditor.com/a11ychecker/1.0.0/

@mlewand mlewand added the task label Mar 17, 2016
@mlewand mlewand added this to the GPL release milestone Mar 17, 2016
@vokiel vokiel self-assigned this Mar 17, 2016
@mlewand mlewand modified the milestones: GPL release, 1.0.1 Mar 29, 2016
@AnnaTomanek
Copy link
Contributor

At least for now this is not needed. The way I proceeded with the SDK sample was to do the same thing that we do for plugin/widget tutorials - put the plugins in the assets directory and load them with addExternal.

Let's see how it works (i.e. whether too many people are not leeching AC directly from the SDK server) before we proceed with using CDN.

@vokiel
Copy link
Member

vokiel commented Apr 22, 2016

As we gonna have demos on AC LP, CKEditor, CKSource websites, SDK - then it would be easier to have them all linking to one place.
And if we create there symlink for latest, then updates will be done automatically. Now it takes too much time to go through all pages using it.

@AnnaTomanek
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, would be cool to have, but in any case, this is not a prerequisite to make the SDK sample work as it works without it now ;) Plus we need to do some additional steps to ensure this will work for "offline" SDK as well.

As for automatic updates, well, this may backfire on us :D

@vokiel
Copy link
Member

vokiel commented Apr 22, 2016

In case of offline SDK it could be better to have it bundled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants