Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make "include only collection resources" more prominent #374

Open
dietervu opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Make "include only collection resources" more prominent #374

dietervu opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@dietervu
Copy link
Contributor

Both Henk and Darja indicated that the results in the VLO are often overshadowed by records located in the lower sections of the CMDI hierarchy (e.g. "sessions" in speech corpora). There is the Only include collection resources option that can be enabled to address this, but it is hidden (under Search Options) and disabled by default. Would be good to rethink this and maybe do the filtering the other way: by default enable this option and offer to extend the search at the bottom of the result list.

@HenkvdHeuvel
Copy link

Yes I think it is better to do enable this collection option by default

@twagoo
Copy link
Member

twagoo commented Nov 2, 2023

One idea that comes to mind in terms of how to present this to the user is have a selector (tabs, dropdown, toggle...) in the search results area, I imagine on top, to switch between Collection results | All results. I would like to be able to add Non-collection results but we have a precision issue, as it is hard to automatically determine whether a metadata record represents a collection. We may also need a more precise definition of what we consider to be a collection.

@twagoo twagoo added this to the VLO 4.12 milestone Feb 27, 2024
@twagoo twagoo modified the milestones: VLO 4.12, VLO 4.13 Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants