Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the TGrep and DH-REP data #237

Open
bansp opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Update the TGrep and DH-REP data #237

bansp opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
centre data issues regarding data provided by individual centres (name them in the issue description)

Comments

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Sep 29, 2023

Stefan Funk writes:

  1. How shall we recommend formats for more generic repositories as TG- and DH-rep? For TG we could easily take the following:
  • recommended (Text and Image visualisation, IIIF support): text/xml (TEI), text/plain, TIFF, JPEG
  • acceppted (storage and archiving only, high probability for LTP): all non-problematic LTP formats (see nestor criteria catalogue)
  • discouraged (storage and archiving only): all problematic LTP formats (also see nestor criteria catalogue 😄

For DH-rep as still far more generic research data repository we could recommend and accept all non-problematic LTP formats, discouraged would be the same as TG-rep. Would that be the way to go? According to DANS

https://clarin.ids-mannheim.de/standards/views/view-centre.xq?id=DANS

we just could take all non-problematic LTP mimetypes in the list and declare them recommended/accepted, and all problematic LTP formats would be discouraged. We also could add a link to our

https://repository.de.dariah.eu/doc/services/data-policies.html#recommendations-and-list-of-preferred-formats

repository documentation.

@bansp bansp added the centre data issues regarding data provided by individual centres (name them in the issue description) label Sep 29, 2023
@bansp bansp added this to the Recommendations version 1.0.1 milestone Sep 29, 2023
@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Sep 29, 2023

Note: I thought I would take a quick stab at this myself, despite our policy of not performing such services (for lack of resources), but it's not clear to me what I should put into the resulting sketch of recommendations.

I am not sure what domains are meant for the particular recommendations (see list of domains: https://clarin.ids-mannheim.de/standards/views/list-domains.xq )

And I assume that these the nestor criteria are to be found somewhere under https://www.langzeitarchivierung.de/Webs/nestor/DE/Publikationen/nestor_Materialien/nestor_materialien_node.html but I regret to say that I can't afford the time for deeper research right now.

@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Oct 13, 2023

Moving the ticket because it's become an unlikely goal for the upcoming CAC.

@fungunga
Copy link

fungunga commented Nov 2, 2023

Thanks for opening this ticket! I think, we just try to work out these format specifications for TG and DH-rep as a first effort on our side and then you can comment on them... please give the ticket to me :-D

@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Nov 3, 2023

Thank you, Stefan! :-)

@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Jun 5, 2024

Housekeeping: ticket moved to the next milestone, pending release of v. 1.1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
centre data issues regarding data provided by individual centres (name them in the issue description)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants