Iterable protocol #124
Merged
Iterable protocol #124
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
PR looks good to me, but what is the issue being addressed? The issue mentioned is the same as the PR id |
|
Maybe one consideration: in CLJS there is a |
|
I tried to make an issue, but magit seems to have lied to me. Will create an issue explaining it later |
Closed
borkdude
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR for implementing the JS iterable protocol as an actual Clava protocol that can be extended to Clava types, addressing #125