-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NME metric #20
Comments
For the NME part, you can refer to the benchmark of 3DDFA, here. |
Can you share the expected NME of the three onnx models (mobilenet, mobilenet0.5, resnet22) on both datasets? |
@shachargluska could you share your code. |
I hacked pieces from this repo to the benchmark of 3DDFA mobilenet_v1_1.0_120x120 - 3.68% Those are nme over aflw2k3d |
Could you share the code ? I will appreciate it very much, Sir! |
@lewisandJiang |
I have applied benchmark.py3DDFA to 3DDFA_v2 by changing the load model codes, but I got weird results: mobilenet_v1_1.0_120x120 23.654% (aflw20003d) and 22.853%(aflw), should I change the "reconstruct_vertex" code or the code to calculate nme? Hoping for your reply, I will appreciate it very much, Sir! |
Hello, thanks for your excellent work!
The NME of different datasets is an important metric. For a fair comparison, may you share the code about how to calculate the NME? Or are there any official code to calculate the NME metrics, and the visibility vector which is shown in "Pose-Invariant 3D Face Alignment(ICCV 2015)" as follow:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34161960/95536243-20780d00-0a1d-11eb-8e84-fc60ca8e94da.png)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34161960/95536209-063e2f00-0a1d-11eb-97ba-46d55c8dc8cb.png)
Looking forward to your reply. Good luck!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: