Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate FluentBit vs Fluentd for Daemonset #17

Open
krsna1729 opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Investigate FluentBit vs Fluentd for Daemonset #17

krsna1729 opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@krsna1729
Copy link
Contributor

https://logz.io/blog/fluentd-vs-fluent-bit/

@ahsan518
Copy link
Contributor

ahsan518 commented Sep 5, 2019

Can you provide more details ? Is this still a relevant to be added.

@krsna1729
Copy link
Contributor Author

adding a smaller footprint version of fluentd is useful or not was the point the issue

@ahsan518 ahsan518 self-assigned this Sep 9, 2019
@NitinAtIntel NitinAtIntel added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 16, 2019
@ahsan518 ahsan518 removed their assignment Sep 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants