You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In all cases the groupid, artifactid, and version are "org.openjfx", "javafx-base", and "14". Taking these dependencies from Maven Central, the ClearlyDefined Id is the same in all cases:
maven/mavencentral/org.openjfx/javafx-base/14
It strikes me that the classifier should be part of the name in a ClearlyDefined ID, but I can't find any reference to a convention that would make this consistent.
How should this be handled?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. You have any thoughts as to what we should do here?
Will take a bit of design work to see what would work best as that was not in the original use cases. I'm a bit loath to add another segment to coordinates (both because that would be a pervasive change and we only have one example scenario).
It could potentially be included in the name segment of a coordinate and then handled appropriately but the maven-oriented providers.
I tend to agree with not adding another segment. There's some elegance in the consistency of having all ids be in five parts.
My thinking is that, at least from a ClearlyDefined perspective, this is just a qualification of the name. I am thinking, however, that there must be use cases where we need to preserve the ability to move back to a Maven GAV.
Are there any special characters that we can employ to separate the name from the classifier without breaking everything else? e.g., "maven/mavencentral/org.openjfx/javafx-base@win/14"
Maven GAVs have an optional part that allows the specification of a classifier.
e.g.,
In all cases the groupid, artifactid, and version are "org.openjfx", "javafx-base", and "14". Taking these dependencies from Maven Central, the ClearlyDefined Id is the same in all cases:
It strikes me that the classifier should be part of the name in a ClearlyDefined ID, but I can't find any reference to a convention that would make this consistent.
How should this be handled?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: