You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@ClementPinard Hi, thanks for your great work, I used it when training FlowNet2C. Install is well-done. I use SpatialCorrelationSampler(kernel_size=1, patch_size=21, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1, dilation_patch=2) to replace the correlation function in the code. But the training loss didn't decrease and the validation EPE is very big. I don't know why, could you please give me some suggestions? Thanks very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your interest in this repo.
Can you add some details ? What code do you use exactly ? Do you have a repo name ? I used this repo for FlowNetC in my own FlowNetPytorch repo without problem.
@ClementPinard Thanks for your quick reply. I use the NVIDIA/flownet2-pytorchhttps://github.com/NVIDIA/flownet2-pytorch repo. When i use its own correlation function to train FlowNet2C, the loss is bumping, but train FlowNet2S can get a right result. So I guess the bad result on FlowNet2C is because of correlation layer, thus i used your work to replace the original function. It seems that the loss is still bumping.
I use cuda 10.0, pytorch 1.2, gcc 4.4.7. is there some problems here?
Do you have other trick to train FlowNet2C?
Extremely Grateful.
@ClementPinard Hi, thanks for your great work, I used it when training FlowNet2C. Install is well-done. I use
SpatialCorrelationSampler(kernel_size=1, patch_size=21, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1, dilation_patch=2)
to replace the correlation function in the code. But the training loss didn't decrease and the validation EPE is very big. I don't know why, could you please give me some suggestions? Thanks very much.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: