Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tutorial: accuracy of naive model on adversarial examples seems high #4

Closed
goodfeli opened this issue Sep 15, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@goodfeli
Copy link
Contributor

I got something > .6. Not sure why this would be; I'd expect something like .99 for such a large eps.

@goodfeli
Copy link
Contributor Author

oh, maybe because it's a convolutional model. all my MNIST experiments in the past have been with fully connected models.

@npapernot
Copy link
Member

I tried removing the convolutions and it decreases adversarial accuracy

@goodfeli
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, this seems legit then. Interesting that convolution is so effective on MNIST.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants