Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

windows: consider chocolatey instead of scoop #283

Closed
borkdude opened this issue Jun 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

windows: consider chocolatey instead of scoop #283

borkdude opened this issue Jun 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
devops expired expired - might be closed due to too little activity help wanted Extra attention is needed windows
Projects
clj-kondo

Comments

@borkdude
Copy link
Member

borkdude commented Jun 20, 2019 •
edited
Loading

It seems chocolatey supports dependencies whereas scoop is just an installer without package management. With a dependency on https://chocolatey.org/packages/vcredist2010 we might be able to run clj-kondo out of the box on a bare Windows 10 system.
@borkdude borkdude added devops windows help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jun 20, 2019
@sogaiu
Copy link
Contributor

sogaiu commented Jun 24, 2019

Based on the response from the Graal folks here:

oracle/graal#1407 (comment)

May be it makes sense to try this?

@borkdude borkdude added this to Low priority in clj-kondo Oct 15, 2019
clj-kondo automation moved this from Low priority to Done Nov 23, 2019
@borkdude borkdude added the expired expired - might be closed due to too little activity label Nov 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
devops expired expired - might be closed due to too little activity help wanted Extra attention is needed windows
Projects
clj-kondo
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@borkdude @sogaiu