-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Events in the Actor Model world #87
Comments
@rogeralsing see: #84 |
@rogeralsing given the change we've made to the spec, is this still an issue or can we close this? |
@rogeralsing lots of serializations can be written for CloudEvents. I would like to close this but I think the question of whether we should deal with batching is one that might be worth discussion - going to tag this as v1.0 |
Related to:#72 ? |
Potentially, but I read #72 as an 1-1 layering/wrapping of messages.
|
During the 6/15 f2f we agreed to close this for now and if it pops up as a requirement later on then we can reopen it. |
I'm trying to get what context this initiative is trying to cover.
I run the Proto.Actor project, cross platform actor framework (http://proto.actor)
For us, things like batching to increase throughput and reduce overall message size is important.
e.g. we buffer messages either until the buffer is full or deadline timeout and then compress the payload by replacing message names/namespaces with identifiers unique for the message batch.
We also heavily rely on things like location transparency, we have the concept of PID (process ID, copied from Erlang, ActorRef in Akka).
Are things like this taken into consideration when designing the spec?
At what level does the spec live, is it down to the raw bits and bytes serialization level?
Or is it more of a checklist that applies above this?
e.g. you can be cloudevent compatible while using either JSON or ProtoBuf or other serializers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: