Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: Implement durable objects + service environments #739

Closed
threepointone opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #868 or #849
Closed

feat: Implement durable objects + service environments #739

threepointone opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #868 or #849
Assignees
@threepointone

Comments

@threepointone
Copy link
Contributor

Using this issue for tracking the work to make sure durable objects, with migrations and all, works with wrangler2.
@threepointone threepointone added this to the 2.0 milestone Mar 31, 2022
@threepointone threepointone self-assigned this Mar 31, 2022
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
30987f1 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
@threepointone threepointone mentioned this issue Apr 30, 2022
Merged
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
d1e3f43 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
a65e778 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue May 1, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
527b067 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
6589b09 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects
ac9eed5 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
threepointone added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2022
@threepointone
feat: implement service environments + durable objects (#868)
6ecb1c1 
Now that the APIs for getting migrations tags of services works as expected, this lands support for publishing durable objects to service environments, including migrations. It also removes the error we used to throw when attempting to use service envs + durable objects.

Fixes #739
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this issue May 2, 2022
Merged
@a-robinson
Copy link
Member

🎉 🎉 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@threepointone threepointone

Labels
None yet
Projects
workers-sdk
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@threepointone @a-robinson