-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add phase PhaseWaitNotActiveInstances
#2612
Conversation
❗ By default, the pull request is configured to backport to all release branches.
|
/test limit=local |
@armru, here's the link to the E2E on CNPG workflow run: https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/actions/runs/5937442535 |
/test limit=local |
@armru, here's the link to the E2E on CNPG workflow run: https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/actions/runs/6071322370 |
/test limit=local |
@armru, here's the link to the E2E on CNPG workflow run: https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/actions/runs/6074002031 |
Very risky PR, has a lot of implications. Adding the label |
/test limit=local |
@armru, here's the link to the E2E on CNPG workflow run: https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/actions/runs/6146259270 |
Signed-off-by: Armando Ruocco <armando.ruocco@enterprisedb.com>
Signed-off-by: Armando Ruocco <armando.ruocco@enterprisedb.com>
Signed-off-by: Armando Ruocco <armando.ruocco@enterprisedb.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Li <tao.li@enterprisedb.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com>
/ok-to-merge E2e failure are unrelated (replication slots) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
except for the debug log which still needs to be updated as we discussed, LGTM! 🎉
Signed-off-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com>
Add an explicit phase to state we wait for some instances to become ready. Previously, the operator retained the previous phase until all the instances were ready. (e.g., remaining in the `failing over` phase for a long time after the actual failover was done) Closes #2611 Signed-off-by: Armando Ruocco <armando.ruocco@enterprisedb.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Li <tao.li@enterprisedb.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com> Co-authored-by: Tao Li <tao.li@enterprisedb.com> Co-authored-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b29e81)
Add an explicit phase to state we wait for some instances to become ready. Previously, the operator retained the previous phase until all the instances were ready. (e.g., remaining in the `failing over` phase for a long time after the actual failover was done) Closes #2611 Signed-off-by: Armando Ruocco <armando.ruocco@enterprisedb.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Li <tao.li@enterprisedb.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com> Co-authored-by: Tao Li <tao.li@enterprisedb.com> Co-authored-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b29e81)
Closes #2611