You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
justgrimes.review is great but the whole experience lacks any real consequences. Without the introduction of some form of adverse stimuli per rating @justgrimes behavior will not be appropriately corrected. I think we need to establish a mechanism in which a bad rating results in @justgrimes being immediately shocked on a scale between 0-150 volts depending on the severity of the rating. Beyond shocks, other potential mechanisms include the use of visual, auditory, or haptic feedback. Additional integration with other services and future iot devices may afford additional feedback opportunities (flash lights via philips hue, play terrible music via amazon echo, disable appliances via wemo, disable air conditioning via nest, etc)
justgrimes.review is great but the whole experience lacks any real consequences. Without the introduction of some form of adverse stimuli per rating @justgrimes behavior will not be appropriately corrected. I think we need to establish a mechanism in which a bad rating results in @justgrimes being immediately shocked on a scale between 0-150 volts depending on the severity of the rating. Beyond shocks, other potential mechanisms include the use of visual, auditory, or haptic feedback. Additional integration with other services and future iot devices may afford additional feedback opportunities (flash lights via philips hue, play terrible music via amazon echo, disable appliances via wemo, disable air conditioning via nest, etc)
Proposed rating/shock system
5 rating = vibration (positive)
4 rating = vibration (positive)
3 rating = 20 volts
2 rating = 45 volts
1 rating = 150 volts
Such a process would require a notification system or rss feed to implement see #12
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: