Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem in NanoAOD for cut-based electrons after merge of #23477 #23641

Closed
fabiocos opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Problem in NanoAOD for cut-based electrons after merge of #23477 #23641

fabiocos opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

After the merge of #23477 there are two reproducible failures in test NanoAOD wfs 1329.1 and 136.7722 with the message

----- Begin Fatal Exception 22-Jun-2018 09:39:05 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'UnknownUserInt' occurred while
[0] Processing Event run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1 stream: 1
[1] Running path 'nanoAOD_step'
[2] Calling method for module SimpleCandidateFlatTableProducer/'electronTable'
Exception Message:
Requested UserInt cutbasedID_Fall17_V1_tight is not available! Possible UserInts are:
ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2Spring15NonTrig25nsV1Categories ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2Spring15Trig25nsV1Categories ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2Spring15Trig50nsV1Categories VIDNestedWPBitmap cutbasedID_HEEP cutbasedID_HLT cutbasedID_loose cutbasedID_medium cutbasedID_tight cutbasedID_veto mvaSpring16GP_WP80 mvaSpring16GP_WP90 mvaSpring16HZZ_WPL
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

This looks related to the update

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/23477/files#diff-170f93a54063f185360137b9496b90ca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @fabiocos Fabio Cossutti.

@davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign analysis

@arizzi @gpetruc could you please have a look?

@perrotta @slava77 FYI

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: analysis

@arizzi,@monttj,@gpetruc you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed by #23656 with a suggestion by @slava77

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants