You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Re: Org structure - We are a little bit worried that this many groups may fragment the community too much (number of meetings, etc.). One way could be to combine RA1 Core and RA1 Ops, RA2 Core and RA2 Ops, RI1 Core and RI1 Dev. Shouldn't RI and RC groups be represented in OPNFV directly, using the already existing structures there instead of in CNTT? (Note: To be defined in Overall Structure of CNTT.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Re: Org structure - We are a little bit worried that this many groups may fragment the community too much (number of meetings, etc.). One way could be to combine RA1 Core and RA1 Ops, RA2 Core and RA2 Ops, RI1 Core and RI1 Dev. Shouldn't RI and RC groups be represented in OPNFV directly, using the already existing structures there instead of in CNTT? (Note: To be defined in Overall Structure of CNTT.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: