[RA2 Ch06] Add most of sigs in RA2 chapter 6 #2400
Conversation
It remains sig-storage which asks for a deep dive on both features and drivers. As starting point, the features list conforms with the upstream K8s gates (kind). It allows RA2 team to update the mandatory choices which RC2 will conform. It's worth mentioning that a few related test could be still skipped in RC2 (only for gce, disruptive, alpha, etc.). Signed-off-by: Cédric Ollivier <cedric.ollivier@orange.com>
collivier
requested review from
rgstori,
scottsteinbrueck and
walterkozlowski
as code owners
rgstori
requested review from
CsatariGergely,
pgoyal01,
tomkivlin,
karinesevilla and
kumarsumangit
pgoyal01
changed the title
| | **Labels** | **Mandatory** | | ||
| |------------------------------|:-------------:| | ||
| | Conformance | X | | ||
| | None | X | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And in all other SIG-s?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these are labels. "None" selects all functest objects that have the label "none".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Conformance" means it's in the k8s conformance test, and "None" means mainstream features
|
|
||
| | **Labels** | **Mandatory** | | ||
| |------------------------------|:-------------:| | ||
| | Conformance | X | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is Conformance here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And in all other SIG-s? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these are labels. "Conformance" selects all functest objects that have the label "Conformance".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Conformance" means it's in the k8s conformance test, and "None" means mainstream features
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have an explanation of this in the intro chapter? I'm okay to have this in an other pr.
| | None | X | | ||
| | Feature:DaemonSetUpdateSurge | | | ||
| | Feature:IndexedJob | | | ||
| | Feature:StatefulSet | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think StatefulSet is needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, let's add this to a new PR though (including adding columns for the description of each feature in plain English and the traceability to ch4 specs)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okey. Should I create an issue to capture this?
| | Feature:Networking-IPv4 | X | | ||
| | Feature:Networking-IPv6 | | | ||
| | Feature:Networking-Performance | X | | ||
| | Feature:NetworkPolicy | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think NetworkPolicy should be supported, however I could not find any supporting requirement in Ch4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's add one to chapter 4 first then, then add the X here with a new PR
(or not)
It remains sig-storage which asks for a deep dive on both features
and drivers. As starting point, the features list conforms with the
upstream K8s gates (kind).
It allows RA2 team to update the mandatory choices which RC2 will
conform. It's worth mentioning that a few related test could be still
skipped in RC2 (only for gce, disruptive, alpha, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Cédric Ollivier cedric.ollivier@orange.com