New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RM Ch04] Rewrite of 4.2 aligned with RM 2.4 #2450
Conversation
major changes and renumbering to align with concepts introduced in RM 2.4; also incorporates some of the content from PR #2320 (it has been reworded for flow etc.) under Section 4.2
@walterkozlowski recommended using this PR for other minor changes including Title of Section 2.4 and adding a sentence with a reference to Section 4.2. |
@walterkozlowski recommended using this PR for other minor changes including Title of Section 2.4 and adding a sentence with a reference to Section 4.2. Done with this commit.
In RM-ch04-node-profiles.*, word "Indeterminate" does not sound right for AAA. I don't have a better one though. @petorre Changed to "non-predictable" -- does that work? |
Changed "Indeterminate" to "Non-predictable" as per @petorre
Adding Network Intensive Profile Extension using SR-IOV
Co-authored-by: Petar Torre <petar.torre@intel.com>
Typo -- added space
|
||
<p align="center"><img src="../figures/ch04_vnf_design.png" alt="workload_design" title="Workload Design" width="65%"/></p> | ||
<p align="center"><b>Figure 4-2:</b> Workloads built against Cloud Infrastructure Profiles and compute Flavours.</p> | ||
<p align="center"><img src="../figures/RM-ch04-node-profiles.png" alt="node_workload_profiles" title="Node and Workload Profiles" width="65%"/></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The figure shows a profile "N" for High Performance (later "H").
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ulikleber I don't see the "N" in this figure -- maybe we can have a session to walk through.
Co-authored-by: Ulrich Kleber <53302540+ulikleber@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ulrich Kleber <53302540+ulikleber@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ulrich Kleber <53302540+ulikleber@users.noreply.github.com>
adopt suggestion of @karinesevilla on CPU allocation ratio
@petorre @ulikleber Thanks for your valuable suggestions and review. For some reason your reviews do not showup in the Reviewers with the green tick mark. Would it be possible for you to re-approve? Thanks |
Fixes #2366
major changes and renumbering to align with concepts introduced in RM 2.4; also incorporates some of the content from PR #2320 (it has been reworded for flow etc.) under Section 4.2
Figures will be updated with further commits