Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded Q -> M from #694 [1675343502331] #880

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue Feb 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Upgraded Q -> M from #694 [1675343502331] #880

c4-judge opened this issue Feb 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-492 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 2, 2023

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #694 as M risk. The relevant finding follows:

there is no check that duration of the Minipool is bigger than 14 days and a malicious node runner can set duration as 0 day and if he fails the calculated slash amount would be 0.

@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label Feb 2, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

c4-judge commented Feb 2, 2023

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as duplicate of #492

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

c4-judge commented Feb 8, 2023

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-492 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant