Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruby Analysis #36

Closed
bruno- opened this issue Jun 27, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Ruby Analysis #36

bruno- opened this issue Jun 27, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@bruno-
Copy link

bruno- commented Jun 27, 2015

Hi,
thanks for working on code climate and making it a great tool. I was pretty excited when I saw you open sourced a bunch of stuff a couple days ago.

Playing with code climate cli on a ruby project today I realized I can't really get the same output from the cli tool as from your cloud platform. The only ruby engine is rubocop and I can't get for example ruby class grading (A to F), complexity, duplication and security issues etc..

Those awesome code climate specific goodies are not open sourced?

Not open sourcing those is reasonable and makes complete sense from the business POV. I'm asking just to make sure I'm not somehow missing a lot of (free) value here.

Thanks and keep up the good work!

@jonathancadepowers
Copy link

Hey @bruno-

You're right -- the types of Ruby checks that we run on our hosted, legacy analysis platform are currently different than what you'll see in our CLI.

Our plan though is to release more Code Climate engines to perform the types of Ruby analysis that you mentioned (complexity, duplication, etc.). When those are released, you'll be able to run them within our CLI!

Our team will be working on new engines, plus now that the platform is open/extensible, anyone can build their own Code Climate engines as well. So, the scope of engine-based analysis for all languages should grow over time.

As far as grades go, those will just be on codeclimate.com.

Great questions! Let us know if we can help with anything else. Thanks!

@bruno-
Copy link
Author

bruno- commented Jun 29, 2015

Hey,
it's good to hear you guys will be open sourcing more engines eventually. That will increase the value of the open sourced CLI tools dramatically.
Be sure to let us know when new engines are out!

Thanks for the fast and friendly response!

@bruno- bruno- closed this as completed Jun 29, 2015
@joshpfosi joshpfosi mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants