Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Break out the reporting format spec #31

Closed
fulldecent opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Break out the reporting format spec #31

fulldecent opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@fulldecent
Copy link
Contributor

Right now this spec is for making machines to do static analysis.

But the input and output formats can apply to a MUCH wider audience.

I have merged a standard I was working on to be compatible with this spec AND it also supports:

  • Static code analyzers
    • Code linters
    • Code style checkers
    • Minification checkers
  • Other static analyzers
    • Image metadata checkers
    • Image compression checkers
    • Spelling checkers
    • Grammar checkers
    • Digital signature verification
  • Dynamic code analysis
    • Unit tests (logic tests)
    • Automated UI tests
    • Continuous integration tests
  • Volatile testing
    • Link checkers
    • Package manager version checkers (requirement to use latest upstream versions)
    • Deployment testing (dry run)
  • Manual testing
    • Manual inspection
    • Manual walkthroughs
    • Customer feedback

It is at https://github.com/fulldecent/structured-acceptance-test

It you want to help change the world, please let me know and we can get together with this.

@fulldecent
Copy link
Contributor Author

The latest commit fulldecent/structured-acceptance-test@d30afa6 now specifies notes and extra restrictions for Code Climate.

@mrb
Copy link
Contributor

mrb commented Feb 26, 2016

@fulldecent We're scheduled to chat today - we can discuss this then!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants