Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Importing San Jose building footprints into OSM #4

Open
3vivekb opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

Importing San Jose building footprints into OSM #4

3vivekb opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@3vivekb
Copy link
Contributor

3vivekb commented Jul 14, 2017

Basemap_2 at San Jose Public Works GIS resources seems to include building footprints. It should be evaluated for import into OSM.

@3vivekb
Copy link
Contributor Author

3vivekb commented Nov 30, 2018

Compare the https://github.com/osmlab/ms-building-import microsoft building footprints to the Public works footprints, do the comparison.

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Nov 30, 2018

If I’m not mistaken, that was Microsoft’s first tranche of buildings, drawn by humans. There’s also a second, newer tranche that’s more comprehensive but drawn algorithmically using computer vision, so it may be less accurate.

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Sep 11, 2019

This import is being tracked in greater detail in impiaaa/SV-OSM#3, as well as in this draft proposal.

@impiaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

impiaaa commented Sep 21, 2019

Open questions:

  • Figure out what to do with condos
  • Decide on meters or feet
  • Decide on "house" or "detached"
  • Which sjc: tags are worth keeping and which should be omitted?
  • What is the source data's vintage?

Preprocessing steps (to rewrite in SQL):

  • Detect and split off buildings intersecting with existing OSM data
  • Automatically group or remove large address sites (apartments, hotels, etc.)
  • Small parcel, one address, one major building: Single home. Put address on building.
  • Large parcel, one address, one major building: Possibly site (school, hospital, office). Deal with later.
  • Small parcel, multiple addresses, one major building: Condo or duplex. Leave address points.
  • Large parcel, multiple addresses, one major building: Office/apartments/hotel/other development. Delete, merge, or leave depending on clustering.
  • Large parcel, one address, multiple buildings. Possibly site (school, hospital, office). Deal with later.
  • Large parcel, multiple addresses, multiple buildings: Possibly settlement (mobile home park). Try to combine addresses with buildings. If common addtl_loc, use for parcel.
  • Building intersecting multiple parcels: Condo or unit. Leave address point.

Translation steps:

  • Expand street abbreviations/align with OSM
  • Translate OSM tags

Manual steps:

  • Join multi-part buildings
  • Deal with sites
  • Add missing streets

Process:

  • Create import/dividing/conflation plan
  • Create a wiki page
  • Get community buy-in
  • Add to Import/Catalogue
  • Import review
  • Create dedicated user account(s)

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Sep 29, 2019

Leave address point.

👍 We had mused about leaving address areas (ways tagged area=yes addr:*), but apparently openstreetmap-carto only imports address points, building areas, or landuse areas, not bare address areas.

@impiaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

impiaaa commented Nov 29, 2019

Tasking manager project: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/167

@impiaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

impiaaa commented Dec 9, 2019

Updated link: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/175

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Jul 8, 2021

@impiaaa finished the first phase of the import on July 4:

done

Before/after of one area in OSM Buildings

Screenshot_2019-11-26 OSM Buildings lat=37 32884 lon=-121 84431 zoom=16 0 tilt=30
Screenshot 2021-07-04 at 19-30-29 San Jose (US) • OSM Buildings

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Jul 9, 2021

We’ve kicked off phase 2 of the import to update geometries and add heights to all the preexisting, hand-mapped buildings in the city.

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Jul 21, 2022

@impiaaa has single-handedly completed phase 2, so now all that’s left is to help with validating the completed tasks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants