New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Visibility of the stakingToken isn't public #25
Comments
We actually expose
Looking at the HarbourProject implementation it may be acceptable to change the name from |
Yep name it |
Might be worth adding that to the discussion on the EIP here: ethereum/EIPs#900 If we rename |
@eduardonunesp out of curiosity, is Loom looking to do something similar? If so, would love to collaborate on ideas. We're thinking of revising the model a little bit to use an intermediary currency (i.e., credits). This way the staking mechanism isn't so prohibitive to smaller users. It would look something like this: User B is a power user and does the same N*T stake. Since they are making frequent transactions, they spend their 10 credits quickly and need to stake more tokens or begin paying for using the protocol. I'll ping you when I have an implementation of this working if it's something you're interested in. |
@johnhforrest sort, not too many details now, I'd like to discuss more for sure, we can touch base in near future :) |
@eduardonunesp Looking forward to it! Feel free to email me directly if you'd like to chat privately. My email address is on my GH profile page. |
Why the declaration of the
stakingToken
on contractERC900BasicStakeContainer.sol
isn't public likeERC20 public stakingToken;
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: