New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Look into moving to codecov.io #20

Closed

dougnukem opened this issue Apr 21, 2016 · 1 comment

Collaborator

dougnukem commented Apr 21, 2016

Looking at codecov.io seems to be a more flexible more full featured solution to code coverage than coveralls.io.

Provides more nuanced diff of coverage (coveralls.io seems broken and confusing in that regard, although they did claim to fix it).
Provides graphs of code coverage over time
Provide file and tree view to view coverage by package/directory of packages not just per file.

Collaborator Author

dougnukem commented Apr 21, 2016

@codingsince1985 I think it would require you as repo admin to sign up for it, and if you sent me the REPO_TOKEN I could set up travis etc.

https://codecov.io

dougnukem mentioned this issue

Codecov.io code coverage report #21

Merged

dougnukem closed this as completed in #21

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment