Update comparison with Runtypes

[yuhr]

Hi, I'm a collaborator of https://github.com/pelotom/runtypes. Some descriptions about Runtypes in README.md have become wrong now 😉

• Missing object methods: (pick, omit, partial, deepPartial, merge, extend)
• Missing nonempty arrays with proper typing ([T, ...T[]])
• Missing lazy/recursive types
• Missing promise schemas
• Missing union & intersection schemas
• Missing error customization
• Missing record schemas (their "record" is equivalent to Zod "object")

[colinhacks]

Can you submit a PR here?

[colinhacks]

Updated.

[yuhr]

Thanks, but the resulting section seems nonsense. I'm sorry for that I have not enumerated required changes exhaustively 🤣 The paragraph also needs to be updated like this:

Good type inference support , but limited options for object type masking (no .pick , .omit , .extend , etc.). No support for Record s (their Record is equivalent to Zod's object ). They DO support branded and readonly types, which Zod does not.

I'm up for filing a PR, but I'm not sure which branch I should send a request to.

[Pictor13]

Is this readme correction still pending for revision?

I suppose master is the target for a PR.

[yuhr]

Yes, it's just been forgotten. Thanks for the reminder, I'll open a PR right now.

[yuhr]

#2536