-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update comparison with Runtypes #407
Comments
Can you submit a PR here? |
Updated. |
Thanks, but the resulting section seems nonsense. I'm sorry for that I have not enumerated required changes exhaustively 馃ぃ The paragraph also needs to be updated like this:
I'm up for filing a PR, but I'm not sure which branch I should send a request to. |
Is this readme correction still pending for revision? I suppose |
Yes, it's just been forgotten. Thanks for the reminder, I'll open a PR right now. |
Hi, I'm a collaborator of https://github.com/pelotom/runtypes. Some descriptions about Runtypes in README.md have become wrong now 馃槈
pick,omit,partial, deepPartial, merge,extend)[T, ...T[]]
)Missing lazy/recursive typesMissing union & intersection schemasMissing record schemas(their "record" is equivalent to Zod "object")The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: