You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Conformance tests (for v1.0) 34, 46, 47, 48, 104, 173 expect implicit quotes in command line around baseCommand item that has spaces. I couldn't find in the spec if this is stated as expected behavior.
I propose that we:
Add this to the spec (for start v1.1.0-dev1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What confuses me is why do the strings need to be quoted when there is space in some of them? I.e., why does baseCommand: ["a b", "c"] return 'a b' c and not a b c? I know this is expected behavior, but I don't know enough to write a proper technical explanation.
Reason why I think it would be nice to add a clarification/explanation to the spec is that, as a new CWL user, one could expect basic string concatenation. E.g. in pseudocode a simple
" ".join(baseCommand)
which would result in a b c command line in the example above.
If this is already explained somewhere in the spec, I think this can be closed. I couldn't find anything on it though.
Conformance tests (for v1.0) 34, 46, 47, 48, 104, 173 expect implicit quotes in command line around
baseCommand
item that has spaces. I couldn't find in the spec if this is stated as expected behavior.I propose that we:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: