You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had conversation with the CUBRC team offline, but I was told to make this request public.
Definitions should avoid examples and intentionally vague language. This isn't an inviolable rule, but one we can avoid in a mid-level ontology. There are cagey words that give wiggle room, and we can avoid them. Terms and phrases like:
example
such as
in other words
for illustration
for instance
typical*
usual*
mostly
often
Examples are supposed to be annotated with cco:example_of_usage
Elucidations are supposed to be annotated with cco:elucidation
For the mid-level ontologies, here's what my QC SPARQL query pulled:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jonathanvajda
changed the title
Avoid (Ontological) Weasel Words in Definitions (unnecessary phrases clauses that merely suggest a boundary)
Avoid (Ontological) Weasel Words in Definitions (unnecessary phrases or clauses that merely suggest a boundary)
Feb 15, 2024
I had conversation with the CUBRC team offline, but I was told to make this request public.
Definitions should avoid examples and intentionally vague language. This isn't an inviolable rule, but one we can avoid in a mid-level ontology. There are cagey words that give wiggle room, and we can avoid them. Terms and phrases like:
Examples are supposed to be annotated with cco:example_of_usage
Elucidations are supposed to be annotated with cco:elucidation
For the mid-level ontologies, here's what my QC SPARQL query pulled:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: