[#217][feat] add doppler.com variables include

[icepuma]

I'm submitting a

• bug fix
• feature
• documentation addition

What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?

My feature contribution is all about having doppler.com secrets being variables in comtrya.

The schemas are:

• doppler://<project>/<config>/<secret>
• doppler://<project>/<config>

The code checks, if you're logged in or not.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #220 (b6baf95) into main (3fd0e90) will decrease coverage by 1.20%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   47.00%   45.80%   -1.21%     
==========================================
  Files          68       69       +1     
  Lines        2136     2192      +56     
==========================================
  Hits         1004     1004              
- Misses       1132     1188      +56     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/src/contexts/variable_include/doppler.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
lib/src/contexts/variable_include/mod.rs	33.33% <0.00%> (-3.51%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3fd0e90...b6baf95. Read the comment docs.

[icepuma]

Sorry for adding you 2 prematurely. I will add more stuff, before I will request your feedback.

[icepuma]

Any objections @rawkode or cool to merge?

[rawkode]

@icepuma If you want to merge this as is, I am happy to do so.

I'm a little unsure about building up CLI executions as this enhancement does and I'm curious how we could integrate a bit more natively with the doppler API.

Why?

Well, it actually seems a bit nicer to use Doppler CLI natively with doppler run -- comtrya and use our ENV contexts instead of parsing the doppler secrets --json command.

I need to give this a little more thought. Perhaps something for our community call to gain more perspectives.

[icepuma]

Let's discuss in our community call

[icepuma]

Maybe DopplerHQ/cli#322 will solve my problem with wanting to have a tighter control over my secrets I want to use in a comtrya run.

With the implementation of my PR we could have multiple single secrets from multiple projects/configurations, which the doppler run - call doesn't support. But maybe this is okay if the user only wants to work with one tuple (project / config)

[rawkode]

@icepuma As discussed, we're happy to close this for the time being?