Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page Cache to Stash Cache #2828

Open
joe-meyer opened this issue Jul 28, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Page Cache to Stash Cache #2828

joe-meyer opened this issue Jul 28, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement:Level Of Effort:2 Enhancements requiring a moderate level of effort required. Enhancement:Quality of Life:2 Enhancements that will have a moderate to large improvement in quality of life Status:Available Reviewed issue, it’s real, we’d review a pull request. Type:Enhancement A need for something new.

Comments

@joe-meyer
Copy link
Contributor

I feel there could be some major benefits to moving the page cache to the stash library. There was small discussion on pr #2492

There was some argument that varnish might not be a great fit into the model of stash, but I think it would be fairly trivial to implement a varnish driver which checks to makes sure it's acting on Collection objects. If it isn't, that's fine it just doesn't save to varnish cache, and if it does, it can easily act on the cache appropriately when the cache object is added / removed.

By leveraging stash we not only allow for the flexibility of additional drivers, but also driver pools and tiered caching levels (not to mention we'd already have numerous caching drivers available to us then to use).

@joe-meyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Work in progress at #2829

@aembler aembler added Type:Enhancement A need for something new. Status:Available Reviewed issue, it’s real, we’d review a pull request. labels Dec 22, 2015
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 14, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the Stale Issues that have been inactive for more than 180 days and will soon be closed label Jan 14, 2020
@KorvinSzanto KorvinSzanto removed the Stale Issues that have been inactive for more than 180 days and will soon be closed label Jan 14, 2020
@aembler aembler added Enhancement:Level Of Effort:2 Enhancements requiring a moderate level of effort required. Enhancement:Quality of Life:2 Enhancements that will have a moderate to large improvement in quality of life labels Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement:Level Of Effort:2 Enhancements requiring a moderate level of effort required. Enhancement:Quality of Life:2 Enhancements that will have a moderate to large improvement in quality of life Status:Available Reviewed issue, it’s real, we’d review a pull request. Type:Enhancement A need for something new.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants