Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check ARPACK error #77

Open
vtraag opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Check ARPACK error #77

vtraag opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vtraag
Copy link
Contributor

vtraag commented Sep 5, 2023

There are a few tests that show intermittent errors ARPACK error. -- No shifts could be applied. This issue has already been investigated before, but never resolved. This issue is to keep track of it, and try to adress it.

I will try to look up what we have done/looked at before, and link/report here whenever relevant.

@vtraag vtraag self-assigned this Sep 5, 2023
@szhorvat
Copy link

I recommend trying with ARPACK 3.9.1 (but not 3.9.0 which is known to have issues). CC @xylar

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Oct 15, 2023

It looks like the arpack maintianers could use some help:
conda-forge/arpack-feedstock#49
there hasn't been much recent progress. I'm not expert enough in c/c++ libraries in general to want to volunteer. If either of you know of anyone you could send over, that would likely really speed up how soon we could move to arpack 3.9.1.

@szhorvat
Copy link

Actually, ARPACK is a Fortran library, which makes the pool of potential maintainers even smaller.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Oct 15, 2023

Ah, yeah, I'm about equally unhelpful there.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Oct 25, 2023

Just a note that I skipped 2 more tests in #82 that were causing trouble. We should re-enable everything (remove the patch) as soon as a new ARPACK is available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants