Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUGS, PERFORMANCE AND PLATFORMS #25

Open
luislavena opened this issue Jan 20, 2011 · 2 comments
Open

BUGS, PERFORMANCE AND PLATFORMS #25

luislavena opened this issue Jan 20, 2011 · 2 comments

Comments

@luislavena
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,

rb-readline is completely unoptimized code, there is a chance that in your platform it behaves painful slow or have some bugs.

rb-readline is used as replacement of GNU Readline as part of RubyInstaller and has been more tested and optimized on Windows than any other platform. The main an sole purpose of the project is to allow a functional IRB console.

Contributions are welcome, and optimizations will be highly appreciated.

@Spakman
Copy link
Collaborator

Spakman commented May 30, 2011

Do we have anyone that has been running on OS X much?

It seems like rb-readline gets decent testing on Windows and Linux, but I haven't really heard anything from those on OS X.

@camdez
Copy link
Contributor

camdez commented Oct 16, 2014

I know this issue is way old, but it's still open, so, eh...

I use rb-readline on OS X quite regularly. I think a lot of other people do at this point (for instance, those who built Ruby without Readline support and want to use something like guard). Performance is sufficiently good that it's not obvious whether one is using GNU Readline or rb-readline. There probably is a drastic difference in speed between the C and Ruby implementations, but numbers involved are tiny enough that it doesn't matter on modern hardware.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants