You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When image of a running container is deleted, should this container still be available for commit?
I think in current containerd design this is doable in two ways.
reconstruct the content, create diff, ingest into content store and recreate layers for the newly committed image (history of original image will be lost)
if image is missing, ask user to provide credentials for original image repo and refetch the missing layers.
there are also similar cases when image is not deleted while contents of some layers are missing (ctr image check image is incomplete), these cases can also be covered.
Describe the solution you'd like
Some feedback about this feature.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
reconstruct the content, create diff, ingest into content store and recreate layers for the newly committed image (history of original image will be lost)
reconstruct the content, create diff, ingest into content store and recreate layers for the newly committed image (history of original image will be lost)
SGTM
Okk, will work on the implementation. thx for replying :)
What is the problem you're trying to solve
I'm not sure whether this is appropriate or not.
When image of a running container is deleted, should this container still be available for commit?
I think in current containerd design this is doable in two ways.
there are also similar cases when image is not deleted while contents of some layers are missing (ctr image check image is incomplete), these cases can also be covered.
Describe the solution you'd like
Some feedback about this feature.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: