Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Some Nmap options do not work inside toolbox container #67

Closed
ghost opened this issue Feb 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Some Nmap options do not work inside toolbox container #67

ghost opened this issue Feb 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
1. Bug Something isn't working 5. Help Wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Priority Board

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 28, 2019 

馃敼[ezakharov@toolbox ~]$ nmap -v -sS -A -p 1-1024 192.168.0.0/24
You requested a scan type which requires root privileges.
QUITTING!
馃敼[ezakharov@toolbox ~]$ sudo nmap -v -sS -A -p 1-1024 192.168.0.0/24
Starting Nmap 7.70 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-02-28 20:57 UTC
NSE: Loaded 148 scripts for scanning.
NSE: Script Pre-scanning.
Initiating NSE at 20:57
Completed NSE at 20:57, 0.00s elapsed
Initiating NSE at 20:57
Completed NSE at 20:57, 0.00s elapsed
Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 20:57
dnet: Failed to open device enp4s0
QUITTING!

Is where anything I can do about it? I don't want to bring nmap into my base image...
@debarshiray debarshiray mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2019
Closed
@debarshiray debarshiray changed the title Nmap does not work inside toolbox container Some Nmap options do not work inside toolbox container Jul 22, 2019
@HarryMichal HarryMichal added this to Needs triage in Priority Board Jul 28, 2020
@HarryMichal HarryMichal added 1. Bug Something isn't working 5. Help Wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 10, 2020
@HarryMichal HarryMichal moved this from Needs triage to Low priority in Priority Board Sep 10, 2020
@debarshiray
Copy link
Member

It's now possible, using the code in Git master, to run toolbox(1) as root. I would say that this is an ideal use-case for that because if something really needs UID 0 on the host, then that's the only option.

@debarshiray
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #267

@debarshiray debarshiray marked this as a duplicate of #267 Nov 3, 2020
Priority Board automation moved this from Low priority to Closed Nov 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1. Bug Something isn't working 5. Help Wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
No open projects
Priority Board
  
Closed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@debarshiray @HarryMichal