Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docs to match SF provider labels #3335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jjcollinge
Copy link
Contributor

@jjcollinge jjcollinge commented May 16, 2018

What does this PR do?

The current docs are inaccurate as documented in this issue. This update aligns the docs with the actual labels used in the provider. See offending code here: https://github.com/containous/traefik-extra-service-fabric/blob/ffb9d2deeb340c0756538b42dcfc0686214c7a6f/servicefabric_labelfuncs.go#L11

Motivation

The current docs are inaccurate so customers are misconfiguring Traefik on Service Fabric.

Fixes containous/traefik-extra-service-fabric#35

More

  • Added/updated tests
  • Added/updated documentation

Copy link
Contributor

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez added the kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. label May 16, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@dtomcej dtomcej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
:shipit:

Copy link
Contributor

@nmengin nmengin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 📖

The current docs are inaccurate as documented in this [issue](containous/traefik-extra-service-fabric#35). This update aligns the docs with the actual labels used in the provider. See offending code here: https://github.com/containous/traefik-extra-service-fabric/blob/ffb9d2deeb340c0756538b42dcfc0686214c7a6f/servicefabric_labelfuncs.go#L11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants