Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allowed fields not possible for users with custom permissions #2484

Closed
dmolineus opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Allowed fields not possible for users with custom permissions #2484

dmolineus opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@dmolineus
Copy link
Contributor

Affected version(s)

^4.4

Description

If I choose custom af the user permission inheritance I am not able to define the allowed fields (alexf). Inf fact a custom can't edit any backend content which has the exclude flag. So this option is pretty useless.

I vote to allow to defiine allowed fields (alexf) for users as well or we should deprecate the inherit mode custom and remove it at all.

@aschempp
Copy link
Member

aschempp commented Nov 5, 2020

I think the idea is you can configure fields through permissions, but use custom to allow specific news archives, page mounts etc.

@dmolineus
Copy link
Contributor Author

You mean it's a readonly access? If I use the custom mode no fields are available from groups, so granting access to news archives etc. doesn't make any sense if the user should edit content.

@fritzmg
Copy link
Contributor

fritzmg commented Nov 5, 2020

It cannot be readonly access either, can it? You don't even see the fields then, or do you?

@frontendschlampe
Copy link
Contributor

frontendschlampe commented Nov 6, 2020

In Contao 3.5 the palette with the fields will open and you can choose the ones, you want to have.

I'm sorry ... my mistake ... you can edit the tables, not the fields.

@aschempp
Copy link
Member

aschempp commented Nov 9, 2020

sorry I confused this with the extend option. custom really only makes sense if you have a table/extension that does not use field permissions (e.g. system maintenance)

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 8, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 8, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants