Add an developer and a editor role

[dawehner]

It would be nice to have a role for editors as well as one role for developers.

What kind of permissions should each of those actually have?

[dawehner]

Potential follow up generate some example users

[e0ipso]

I think it would be a good idea to converge on the same roles Reservoir creates with the same permissions (we'll have more than them because there are more features to grant permissions to).

Roles list

• Anonymous user
• Authenticated user
• Content administrator
• Client developer

[e0ipso]

This was addressed by 076222c. I'm leaving this open in case you want to change the permissions set. I got the permission list from Reservoir.

[wimleers]

• You committed uuids as well in the config. You don't want that :)
• Interesting that you're also adding actions. Can you explain why?
• Finally: do you like the user role labels? Content administrator and Client developer? Would you have chosen different role labels?

[dawehner]

You committed uuids as well in the config. You don't want that :)

As someone who is using Drupal in the wild, I can say the patch provided by alexpott in https://www.drupal.org/node/2788777 totally makes this possible. It allows you to use drush cex with install profiles basically.

Interesting that you're also adding actions. Can you explain why?

This happens when you drush cex :) To be honest though we REALLY don't need them IMHO.

Finally: do you like the user role labels? Content administrator and Client developer? Would you have chosen different role labels?

For me at least "administrator" feels like something with more capabilities. What about "content editor"?

[e0ipso]

Finally: do you like the user role labels? Content administrator and Client developer? Would you have chosen different role labels?

I just reused what it was there. I don't care all that much, i figured that we can change them later. :-P

You committed uuids as well in the config. You don't want that :)

What Daniel said.

Interesting that you're also adding actions. Can you explain why?

We want to have a simple config workflow (it was Alex's only direction). What we want to do is:

• Click around.
• drush cex
• Commit.

Anything more complex than can lead to debugging configuration sets. Not a fun place to be. If that brings in default config that will be created anyways on install, I'm fine with the tradeoff.

[wimleers]

For me at least "administrator" feels like something with more capabilities. What about "content editor"?

But "Content editor" implies more limited capabilities: they can edit content, maybe create new content … but not also publish and manage all content.
That's why I first went with "Content manager". At some point I changed it to "Content administrator".

[e0ipso]

We did this already.