You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm currently using Microsoft.Extensions.Options version 6.0.0 in my project and noticed that contentstack-management-dotnet depends on version 7.0.0. This difference has the potential to cause version conflicts in projects like mine.
Proposed Solution:
Having tested the contentstack-management-dotnet library with Microsoft.Extensions.Options version 6.0.0, I found that it worked smoothly without any noticeable issues. I propose downgrading Microsoft.Extensions.Options package dependency to version 6.0.0. This change would help avoid potential conflicts and increase compatibility with other projects.
I understand there might be reasons to use the latest version, but given my observations, a downgrade could benefit a wider range of users.
Contribution:
I'm ready and willing to contribute a PR for this change if the maintainers agree with this proposal. Please let me know how to proceed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background:
I'm currently using Microsoft.Extensions.Options version 6.0.0 in my project and noticed that contentstack-management-dotnet depends on version 7.0.0. This difference has the potential to cause version conflicts in projects like mine.
Proposed Solution:
Having tested the contentstack-management-dotnet library with Microsoft.Extensions.Options version 6.0.0, I found that it worked smoothly without any noticeable issues. I propose downgrading Microsoft.Extensions.Options package dependency to version 6.0.0. This change would help avoid potential conflicts and increase compatibility with other projects.
I understand there might be reasons to use the latest version, but given my observations, a downgrade could benefit a wider range of users.
Contribution:
I'm ready and willing to contribute a PR for this change if the maintainers agree with this proposal. Please let me know how to proceed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: