Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ring is unusable in robust tactic automation #12553

Open
JasonGross opened this issue Jun 21, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

ring is unusable in robust tactic automation #12553

JasonGross opened this issue Jun 21, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
kind: design discussion Discussion about the design of a feature. part: ring/field The ring and field tactics.

Comments

@JasonGross
Copy link
Member

Description of the problem

Because Add Ring follows Import rather than Export and because there seems to be no way to pass a ring structure to the ring tactic locally, ring is unusable in automation that needs to be robust to reuse. Please add a variant of ring that allows passing the ring structure, or a way to pick up ring structure from the context. (Why not just make Add Ring register some typeclass instances?) (Presumably the same is true of field.)

Coq Version

8.11.0

@Alizter Alizter added kind: design discussion Discussion about the design of a feature. part: ring/field The ring and field tactics. labels Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: design discussion Discussion about the design of a feature. part: ring/field The ring and field tactics.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants