New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

investigate bytecode format with immediates #86

Open

soc opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 0 comments

Milestone

0.9 – new develop...

Collaborator

soc commented Oct 3, 2023

This might allow representing operations with constants/literals directly instead of a load-from-constant-pool + operation.

soc added this to the 0.7 – new developments milestone

soc modified the milestones: 0.7 – new developments, 0.8 – new developments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment