-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backticks are top-heavy #50
Comments
Yes, that's quite an interesting point! On lower-resolution displays, diagonal glyphs seem to lose some thickness. For you and me, with high-quality displays, it's true that the back quote is slightly heavier. But on Windows, the difference might be less. It's hard to replicate, but I can get this, with some effort, on my Mac: and the difference in weight has definitely decreased. If everyone was using Retina Macs, I'd certainly be happy to do this. But if I do, I might get comments from non-Mac users that the back quotes are too thin... ;) Which means I'm undecided... 🤔 |
I see what you mean, and indeed that's hard to assess. It occurred to me that binarizing your image could provide a more objective measure of which glyph would appear heavier; here are some examples with the threshold set at different levels, close to the midpoint between 0 and 255: I would say that they still tend towards the backtick being heavier, but of course, this is no scientific evidence of human perception :) just additional data to inform this discussion. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions! |
Hey @cormullion, is there anything I can do to help move this forward? |
I could add a stylistic alternative for a thinner backtick - it wouldl be |
ss11 is in v0.023, give it a try |
Looks great @cormullion! Here's what I see: It's still more visible than the combining grave, but now it's not as overbearing, and better matches the apparent size of the single quote (yes, it's narrower, but it's also longer due to being slanted, so the "area" seems to be similar). Thanks for the quick resolution! |
/cc @pfitzseb |
Extracting a comment from #27, because I believe it to be a valid suggestion that could be discussed separately:
Besides being objectively wider, the fact that it's a diagonal stroke makes it not pixel-aligned, which adds to its heavier appearance. I do like the larger backticks (with a height matching that of
'
and"
), but I'd prefer if they weren't so top-heavy.Here's a screenshot showing what I see (VSCode, 13" macbook, JuliaMono 0.017):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: