Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User cards sizes are inconsistent #5992

Open
nihal467 opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

User cards sizes are inconsistent #5992

nihal467 opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@nihal467
Copy link
Member

nihal467 commented Aug 2, 2023

Describe the bug

In the user page, we are showing the data's inconsistently, the below mentioned are the data shown in the card :

  1. User Id
  2. Full-name user
  3. Last Online
  4. Role
  5. District
  6. Location ( For some user have it and some don't)
  7. Created by ( For some user and some don't)
  8. Home Facility
  9. Weekly Working Hours
  10. Qualification , Experience and MC Registration ( For doctor's Only)

This whole multiple data's shown in multiple ways for different users, which creates inconsistently in the card size

@aparnacoronasafe I am thinking, we can show all the common components and any specific field like Qualification, anything extra, can be hidden, and give the option to expand to view each user card's full fields.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to https://care.coronasafe.in/users?page=1&limit=18&first_name=&last_name=&phone_number=&alt_phone_number=&user_type=Doctor&district_id=
  2. Scroll down to bottom
  3. See error

Expected behavior

To be reviewed by @aparnacoronasafe

Screenshots

image

@aparnacoronasafe
Copy link
Member

@nihal467 We do not want to hide important data points like qualifications (for doctors)

Let's have a uniform ordering and format.

We could identify data points which are not as relevant and have those hidden (maybe user that created the user, last online etc)

With the above, can you edit the issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Review required
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants