Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing key(s) in state_dict ,the weigh are mismatch for crnn.py #9

Open
HuangGuoHui110 opened this issue Oct 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@HuangGuoHui110
Copy link

Hi, I use the weight file you provided, and modify only the 100th line of the crnn_recognizer.py file to def init(self, model_path='checkpoints/CRNN.pth'). When I execute ' python demo.py' command is an error, the display is as follows

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "demo.py", line 2, in
from ocr import ocr
File "/media/hgh/HGH_30/plate/ocr.pytorch-master/ocr.py", line 6, in
recognizer = PytorchOcr()
File "/media/hgh/HGH_30/plate/ocr.pytorch-master/recognize/crnn_recognizer.py", line 111, in init
self.model.load_state_dict(torch.load(model_path))
File "/mnt/home/hgh/anaconda2/envs/py3_torch4.1/lib/python3.6/site-packages/torch/nn/modules/module.py", line 719, in load_state_dict
self.class.name, "\n\t".join(error_msgs)))
RuntimeError: Error(s) in loading state_dict for CRNN_v2:
Missing key(s) in state_dict: "conv1_1.weight", "conv1_1.bias", "bn1_1.weight", "bn1_1.bias", "bn1_1.running_mean", "bn1_1.running_var", "conv1_2.weight", "conv1_2.bias", "bn1_2.weight", "bn1_2.bias", "bn1_2.running_mean", "bn1_2.running_var", "conv2_1.weight", "conv2_1.bias", "bn2_1.weight", "bn2_1.bias", "bn2_1.running_mean", "bn2_1.running_var", "conv2_2.weight", "conv2_2.bias", "bn2_2.weight", "bn2_2.bias", "bn2_2.running_mean", "bn2_2.running_var", "conv3_1.weight", "conv3_1.bias", "bn3_1.weight", "bn3_1.bias", "bn3_1.running_mean", "bn3_1.running_var", "conv3_2.weight", "conv3_2.bias", "bn3_2.weight", "bn3_2.bias", "bn3_2.running_mean", "bn3_2.running_var", "conv4_1.weight", "conv4_1.bias", "bn4_1.weight", "bn4_1.bias", "bn4_1.running_mean", "bn4_1.running_var", "conv4_2.weight", "conv4_2.bias", "bn4_2.weight", "bn4_2.bias", "bn4_2.running_mean", "bn4_2.running_var", "bn5.weight", "bn5.bias", "bn5.running_mean", "bn5.running_var".
Unexpected key(s) in state_dict: "cnn.conv0.weight", "cnn.conv0.bias", "cnn.conv1.weight", "cnn.conv1.bias", "cnn.conv2.weight", "cnn.conv2.bias", "cnn.batchnorm2.weight", "cnn.batchnorm2.bias", "cnn.batchnorm2.running_mean", "cnn.batchnorm2.running_var", "cnn.batchnorm2.num_batches_tracked", "cnn.conv3.weight", "cnn.conv3.bias", "cnn.conv4.weight", "cnn.conv4.bias", "cnn.batchnorm4.weight", "cnn.batchnorm4.bias", "cnn.batchnorm4.running_mean", "cnn.batchnorm4.running_var", "cnn.batchnorm4.num_batches_tracked", "cnn.conv5.weight", "cnn.conv5.bias", "cnn.conv6.weight", "cnn.conv6.bias", "cnn.batchnorm6.weight", "cnn.batchnorm6.bias", "cnn.batchnorm6.running_mean", "cnn.batchnorm6.running_var", "cnn.batchnorm6.num_batches_tracked".
size mismatch for rnn.1.embedding.weight: copying a param of torch.Size([5835, 512]) from checkpoint, where the shape is torch.Size([5997, 512]) in current model.
size mismatch for rnn.1.embedding.bias: copying a param of torch.Size([5835]) from checkpoint, where the shape is torch.Size([5997]) in current model.

Does the weight file you provide correspond to the network? Thanks!

@qingqing625
Copy link

I have encountered the same problem. Have you solved it?

@courao
Copy link
Owner

courao commented Oct 16, 2019

Hi, I'm so sorry that I update the recognition api, and forgot update the recognition model.
And now, the newest model is updated!

@qingqing625
Copy link

Hi, I'm so sorry that I update the recognition api, and forgot update the recognition model.
And now, the newest model is updated!

thank you ! i can run demo。

@HuangGuoHui110
Copy link
Author

Hi, I'm so sorry that I update the recognition api, and forgot update the recognition model.
And now, the newest model is updated!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants