New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Potential BA.2.75.2/BF.5 recombinants (27 sequences as of 2022-10-11) #1137
Comments
the 10th genome emerged, from Hong Kong again. |
20 sequences as of 2022-10-05, newly found in UK-Scotland, Singapore and Liechtenstein. |
3 new sequences from Hong Kong and US-WA by 2022-10-06. |
1 new sequence from Singapore as of 2022-10-10 (sampled on 2022-10-04). EPI_ISL_15312839. And another 2 from UK-Scotland and US-WA. |
Would recommend this is designated soon as its fairly unusual for the recombinants and very international |
I agree @thomasppeacock @c19850727 Just a quick note that to get something designated fast, it really helps if there's a recent Usher link that I can use to directly grab the sequences. This saves me 5 minutes! Usher is unfortunately still painfully slow, even if you only pass it one EPI_ISL that is already in the tree. |
What makes us think this is BA.2.75.2 rather than BY.1? It doesn't have the S:1199N mutation. Where's the break point? Ah, it has 5921T, alright, it's a BA.2.75.2 :) |
This is a level 5, with RBD scores: immune escape 0.63, ACE2 0.47, composite 0.99 |
Great spot! But why is this supposed to be derived from BF.5? It has neither ORF7a:H47Y, nor ORF9b:K40R. It has ORF9b:D16G (and S:A1020S), though. I think an undesigned sublineage of BA.5.2.1 is the contributing "parent". |
Possible, you're right, I didn't check closely. I remember we never designated the S:1020S founder but went down the geographical nightmare path. If you can find the likely ancestor due to other shared mutations, that'd be useful :) |
@cvejris you're right, it's just a guesswork based on a quick cov-spectrum query of the most prevalent BA.5* with S:A1020S in Tamil Nadu. It could be anything else, including some undesignated branch. |
The ancestor is BA.5.2.1 (ORF9b:D16G, see #657 ) "pre-BF.5", i.e. before acquisition of ORF7a:H47Y. @corneliusroemer this and the tree below is the best I can do... |
I am proposing this potential recombinant with only 9 sequences based on its concerning mutation profile and geographical distribution.
Description
Recombinant between: BA.2.75.2 and BF.5
Earliest sequence: 2022/08/25 (Hong Kong)
Most recent sequence: 2022/09/21 (Netherland)
Countries circulating:
Potential breakpoint: between spike 486 and 1020.
Mutation table:
Mutation on branch: C5192T, G22599C, T23019C, G24620T
GISAID query: NSP3_P822S, NSP8_N118S, Spike_A1020S, M_D3N, -E_T11A
Cov-spectrum query: C3927T, C5192T, G24620T, G26529A
Evidence
Usher tree of current proposal as well as sibling recombinant clusters (under monitoring, yet to be proposed):
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_24d97_431bd0.json?c=gt-nuc_2326,22125,10097,5192,18039&label=nuc%20mutations:G22898A,T22942G
Genomes
EPI_ISL_14810310, EPI_ISL_15002926, EPI_ISL_15120916,
EPI_ISL_15139302-15139303, EPI_ISL_15146650, EPI_ISL_15146671,
EPI_ISL_15146714, EPI_ISL_15146839
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: