Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XCD: Possible XBB.1.5* × BQ.1* recombinant with ORF1a:T4031I, S:R214H, S:T478I, ORF8:V62L (13 seqs, 4 countries) #2042

Closed
NkRMnZr opened this issue Jun 6, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
designated recombinant recombinant proposal
Milestone

Comments

@NkRMnZr
Copy link

NkRMnZr commented Jun 6, 2023

Transferred from sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#148

Query: G22203A, C22995T, C28657T
Earliest seq: 2023-01-26 (EPI_ISL_17683933, Indonesia)
Latest seq: 2023-05-25 (EPI_ISL_17742133, Australia)
Sampled in Countries: Indonesia (6), South Korea (5), Australia (1, NSW), USA (1, Virginia)

Genomes: EPI_ISL_17647594, EPI_ISL_17647595, EPI_ISL_17647596, EPI_ISL_17723340, EPI_ISL_17723346, EPI_ISL_17742133, EPI_ISL_17716667, EPI_ISL_17736554, EPI_ISL_17736565, EPI_ISL_17683903, EPI_ISL_17683933, EPI_ISL_17736545, EPI_ISL_17736560

UShER:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice2_genome_3dd43_ed0b40.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample
Detailed

Evidence:
Mut

  • Somehow nextclade recognize it as XBW, but it is not, for it doesn't have T22612C, C24130T, G29260A
  • it does not have many of XBB.1.5's T17124C
  • it has XBB.1's G22317T (S:G252V) instead of XBB.2.3's A22320G (S:D253G), ruled out possiblity of XBB.2.3* + S:T478I
  • it has S:F486P (T23018C, T23019C), one of the donor could be either XBB.1.5 pre T17124C or other XBB.1 + S:F486P
  • it does not have XBB's C25416T, A26275G (E:T11A), means breakpoint before C25416T, probably the reason being recognized as XBW
  • it does not have BA.5's G26529A (M:D3N), either a second breakpoint or simply reversion Edit: the only sequence that witoutht G26529A (M:D3N) is the earlist sequence EPI_ISL_17683933, others should all have it. Thanks to @FedeGueli for correction.
  • it does not have XBB's M:D61L (G27382C, A27383T, T27384C)
  • it has BQ.1's ORF9b:P10F (C28311T, C28312T), interestingly XBB.1.5.57 (donor of XBL, without T17124C) also has it
  • it has BQ.1's G28681T (N:E136D)

Conclusions & Putative Donors: (cc. @FedeGueli see comments for details)

  • 5' end donor could be a pre T17124C XBB.1.5*, or any other XBB.1* that has S:F486P
  • breakpoint between 23019 and 25416.
  • 3' end donor could be BQ.1.1.25

Private mutations:
C12357T (ORF1a:T4031I), T18006C (ORF1b:L590L), A19173G (ORF1b:T1902T), G22203A (S:R214H), C22995T(S:T478I), G28077T (ORF8:V62L), C28657T (N:D128D)

@NkRMnZr NkRMnZr changed the title Possible XBB.1.5* × BQ.1* recombinant with ORF1a:T4031I, S:R214H, S:T478I, ORF8:V62L, N:P365L (13 seqs, 4 countries) Possible XBB.1.5* × BQ.1* recombinant with ORF1a:T4031I, S:R214H, S:T478I, ORF8:V62L (13 seqs, 4 countries) Jun 6, 2023
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

@NkRMnZr there is an error, this lineage DO HAVE M:D3N :
Schermata 2023-06-06 alle 16 48 44

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

I looked at the putatitve donors, but first to clarify the proposal:
This is XBB.+486P until maximum E:10 ( 26272) and then from 26272 to end is BQ*

I think i have identified the BQ.1 side parent : looking at Bq.1 from 2023 carrying both Orf8:V62L and N:P365L i found just two sequences from Indonesia belonging to BQ.1.1.25 (EPI_ISL_17683939
EPI_ISL_17683936) As shown below they have no difference in the recombinant side to the lineage proposed here:
Schermata 2023-06-06 alle 17 10 51
https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past6M/variants?aaMutations=S%3AT478I%2CS%3A214H&aaMutations1=Orf8%3AG8*&nextcladePangoLineage1=XBB.1*&nucMutations2=C28312T%2CC28657T%2CG28681T%2CC29367T&nextcladePangoLineage2=BQ.1.1.25*&analysisMode=CompareEquals&

While for the xbb.1 side i didnt find any certain parent: ORF1b:T1621I doesnt seem circualting in Indonesia while io found some XBB.1.9.1 with that in Australia that frequently collects lineages from Indonesia (EPI_ISL_17561522) but too weak as proof of anything

@NkRMnZr
Copy link
Author

NkRMnZr commented Jun 7, 2023

@NkRMnZr there is an error, this lineage DO HAVE M:D3N : Schermata 2023-06-06 alle 16 48 44

Thanks @FedeGueli , just realized I used the earlist sequence for analysis and it happens to be the only one without M:D3N. Metadata shows the sequence are from different patients so either dropouts or these seqs are from different recombinantion events, giving there's a 2 months gap between 1st and 2nd sequences.

@corneliusroemer corneliusroemer added this to the XCD milestone Jun 7, 2023
@corneliusroemer corneliusroemer added designated recombinant recombinant proposal labels Jun 7, 2023
@focosi-cyber
Copy link

Could the XBB.donor be XBB.1.5.40? At top of my head that's the only XBB. with T478I ....That's quite rare as a 478 mutation. But I understand XBB.1.5.40 has never been sequenced in Indonesia, Australia or South Korea : only USA.

@NkRMnZr
Copy link
Author

NkRMnZr commented Jun 8, 2023

Could the XBB.donor be XBB.1.5.40? At top of my head that's the only XBB. with T478I ....That's quite rare as a 478 mutation. But I understand XBB.1.5.40 has never been sequenced in Indonesia, Australia or South Korea : only USA.

I'm afraid not, for it doesn't have T17124C, but yeah 478I is a bit rare by that time sequenced for the first time.

@JosetteSchoenma
Copy link

XCD

@NkRMnZr NkRMnZr changed the title Possible XBB.1.5* × BQ.1* recombinant with ORF1a:T4031I, S:R214H, S:T478I, ORF8:V62L (13 seqs, 4 countries) XCD: Possible XBB.1.5* × BQ.1* recombinant with ORF1a:T4031I, S:R214H, S:T478I, ORF8:V62L (13 seqs, 4 countries) Oct 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
designated recombinant recombinant proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants